Counseling Before Bariatric Surgery

Weighing Gastric Band Surgery for the Less Obese from Johns Hopkins Medicine
Until recently, bariatric surgery -- also known as weight-loss surgery -- has been an option only for the severely obese, especially those who also have obesity-related conditions such as type 2 diabetes or sleep apnea (both of which increase the risk for heart disease complications). But now that has changed.
One of the most common bariatric surgeries is adjustable gastric banding, which places a modifiable band around the stomach to curb food intake.  In January 2011, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved gastric banding for those who are less than severely obese.  
How gastric banding works. During gastric banding, an adjustable silicon band is placed around the top part of your stomach. It forms a thumb-sized pouch that can hold only a small amount of food.
"The band's purpose is to prevent overeating," says Michael Schweitzer, M.D., a surgeon at the Johns Hopkins Center for Bariatric Surgery at Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center. 
How? The band is adjusted at a doctor's office to control the rate at which food passes from the pouch to the lower part of the stomach. Slowing the passage of food to the lower part of the stomach makes you feel fuller longer, so you consume fewer calories.
Gastric banding is attractive for many reasons. It's a minimally invasive outpatient procedure -- the surgery itself takes less than an hour. It is also more easily reversed than other bariatric surgeries and has low complication rates.
For example, another common bariatric surgery, gastric bypass, requires that part of your stomach be stapled shut and the digestive tract rerouted. It also includes a two-day hospital stay.
Cons and caveats of gastric banding. There are good reasons not to rush into gastric banding, including:
• Recovery from gastric banding includes a month-long diet of pureed foods and about six trips to the doctor's office for band adjustments in the first year.
• After gastric banding you must also permanently go on a strict low-fat diet to achieve and maintain a normal weight. Eating too much or too fast can cause you to regurgitate swallowed food from the upper pouch after meals.
Finally, if you're a candidate for gastric banding surgery, you'll have to prove that you are ready for both the procedure and challenging lifestyle changes. You must undergo psychological counseling and show that you have tried diet and exercise for at least six months.
Gee, I really don't want to negate bariatric surgery, but my research shows that less than 15% of those who opt for this dangerous surgery ever achieve a healthy weight. It's not because the surgery is bad or doesn't do what it intends to do; it's that most - and I do mean most - patients learn to cheat. And they do so because they have NOT dealt with the underlying emotional issues with food and eating. Counseling does - but counseling works on the past. Coaching does - and it works on the present habits and behaviors and helps the client learn new behaviors. We can't change the past, but we can change the future, and we do it by changing how we think and what we do TODAY.

Obese Adults Should Get Couseling (or Coaching)

By Melissa Healy, Los Angeles Times
June 25, 2012, 8:23 p.m.

In a move that could significantly expand insurance coverage of weight-loss treatments, a federal health advisory panel on Monday recommended that all obese adults receive intensive counseling in an effort to rein in a growing health crisis in America.
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force urged doctors to identify patients with a body mass index of 30 or more — currently 1 in 3 Americans — and either provide counseling themselves or refer the patient to a program designed to promote weight loss and improve health prospects.
Under the current healthcare law, Medicare and most private insurers would be required to cover the entire cost of weight-loss services that meet or exceed the task force's standards.
That could all change Thursday, when the U.S. Supreme Court is expected to rule on the constitutionality of President Obama's healthcare law, which requires adoption of certain recommendations from the task force, such as this one on obesity.
Few private health insurers now reimburse physicians for weight-loss counseling or pay for programs that patients seek out on their own. A growing number, in fact, charge obese patients more for coverage — a policy that some public health officials have denounced as punitive and ineffective.
The task force concluded after a review of the medical literature that the most successful programs in improving patients' health were "intensive, multi-component behavioral interventions." They involve 12 to 26 counseling sessions a year with a physician or community-based program, the panel said.
Successful programs set weight-loss goals, improve knowledge about nutrition, teach patients how to track their eating and set limits, identify barriers to change (such as a scarcity of healthful food choices near home) and strategize on ways to maintain lifestyle changes, the panel found.
In some cases, programs include exercise sessions as well.
The recommendation, published online in the Annals of Internal Medicine, does not apply to the roughly one-third of Americans who are considered overweight, those with a BMI from 25 to 29.9.
It follows a November decision by Medicare to reimburse physicians for providing "intensive weight counseling" to the roughly 14 million obese Americans insured by the government program.
The new guidelines were met with cautious support by many physicians on the front lines of the nation's struggle against excess fat.
Dr. Jack Der-Sarkissian, a family medicine specialist at Kaiser Permanente's Los Angeles Medical Center, called the guidelines a "long-overdue" prod to physicians to help their patients control weight gain, which raises the risk for diabetes, heart disease and other health threats.
He cited a recent study that found that more than half of all obese patients had never been told by their physician that they needed to lose weight. "That's just not fair to the patient," said Der-Sarkissian, who leads Kaiser's adult weight management efforts in Southern California.
"You have to diagnose the patient and have the discussion, even if the patient doesn't really want to hear it," he said.
But Jeffrey Levi, executive director of the nonpartisan think tank Trust for America's Health, said the recommendations would put physicians in a difficult position: Few have the time or resources to provide obese patients with intensive counseling, he said.
And since programs meeting the standards set by the task force remain scarce, most doctors won't know where to send their obese patients.
"The question is whether the services will develop fast enough to meet the potential demand," Levi said.
Susan Pisano, a spokeswoman for the trade group America's Health Insurance Plans, said it was unclear how the report would affect the industry and patients. But, she said, "there's a lot being done" already by health insurers to help their enrollees lose weight.
Obesity and obesity-related diseases are already responsible for an estimated $147 billion in annual healthcare spending. Widespread adoption of the panel's recommendation would increase that spending, at least initially.
The panel acknowledged that one problem with its recommendation was that no studies have shown such intensive programs provide long-term health benefits.
There appear to be short-term ones. Two studies cited by the panel found that patients who received intensive counseling were 30% to 50% less likely to have Type 2 diabetes two to three years later than those who received lighter counseling, drug therapy or both.
But the counseling subjects' cholesterol numbers barely budged, and changes in blood pressure and waist circumference were, on average, small.
A pilot program considered a model by the task force is now being launched in 21 cities by the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
It is based on a clinical trial, the Diabetes Prevention Program, that encouraged modest improvements in food choices and at least 150 minutes of weekly exercise for participants, who were at high risk for developing diabetes.
The subjects, who typically met weekly for six months and monthly for the second half of the year, lost between 5% and 7% of their body weight and reduced their diabetes risk by 58%.
Thanks, Melissa, for pointing out some delicate information. If you've tried diets, diet pills, even bariatric surgery, and are still not at a healthy weight, you need some support. Call me.  830-837-5940. But before you do, please review my website.